Related Videos from Youtube

• 
  Did Attorney General Joseph Biden I...
  Gordon Smith attempted to address the issue, with Attorney General Joseph Biden III, of false allegations of abuse and the violations of Constitutional rights (4th and 14th Amendmend) that can follow as the civil order. becomes a criminal charge. Perceptions are not always reality whether it's a photograph or an allegation. Innocent until proven guilty? Not if the allegation is domestic abuse. Judges and hearing officers are afraid not to grant protection orders for women for fear that any that really might be in danger not get the protection order. This is a defacto conviction of violence, it shows up in employment background checks and on websites like DELJIS that are open to the public. You automatically lose your Second Amendment rights which if you are military, security, police and in some states dog catchers can cause you big problems. After there is an order of protection any allegation that you violated it results in a warrant for arrest. Oh you'll get your day in court if you don't take exception to being arrested and potentially incarcerated in a state prison before that day comes. In Family Court if it comes out of a alleged victims mouth it's considered evidence. Try to prove that you didn't do something. This is why in criminal cases in criminal courts the burden of proof is on the prosecution. In family court you can be convicted and sentenced for a year without getting the option of a trial by jury. In Delaware the proceedings are closed you can't even <b>...</b>
• 
  General Goodshafting (GB): A4V in C...
  The General uses an Acceptance-for-Value (and HM Treasury liquidation) for a court fine, and enforces it's acceptance by the Magistrate by using an Affidavit of Negative Averment and Maxims of Law..... I used an AFFIDAVIT OF NEGATIVE AVERMENT, Read into evidence so that the Judge can 'see' it...(it signed and thumb-printed boldly in red, but was not Notarized). This protocol is based upon the Maxims of Law: 'It matters not what is known to a Judge, lest it be known Judicially' but; 'Delivery makes a deed speak' The Affidavit contained these and other appropriate Maxims of Law, rendering it incontestable; And 'there is no evidence that settlement by Accepted-for-Value is invalid, and I believe that no such evidence exists' Here is the text, which I have modified slightly in respect of my new knowledge......annotations are in [brackets]....you could possibly get it witnessed by a Notary for more punch, but I like to underwrite my own authority. AFFIDAVIT OF FACTS BY SPECIFIC NEGATIVE AVERMENT General of family Goodshafting, a living soul, over 18 years of age, being competent to testify and having first hand knowledge of the facts herein, in consideration of the Maxims of Law, swears and declares under penalty of perjury of the laws of England, that: 1.To swear is to call God to witness and is an act of divine worship [MAXIM] this document is sworn as Truth] 2.I have no evidence that shows that the law requires that to be proved which is apparent to the Court and I believe <b>...</b>
• 
  Columbia Family Law Attorney Crimin...
  www.isaacsandalley.com 803-252-6323 Isaacs & Alley, LLP serves clients in the areas of family law, criminal defense, personal injury, real estate and general litigation. Contact the firm in Columbia, South Carolina for representation.
• 
  Natural Rights, Enumerated Rights,...
  October 15, 2008 Speaker: Michael W. McConnell, Presidential Professor of Law, Judge, 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals Summary: The Sumner Canary Lecture When faced with drafting a Bill of Rights, members of the First Congress were faced with an impossible problem: what to include and what to leave out. Lockean theory told them that after construction of a social compact, such as the Constitution, the people would retain all rights not relinquished to the state. But what was the legal status of those retained rights, and how would they be affected by the explicit enumeration of some but not all of them? Michael W. McConnell joined the faculty of SJ Quinney College of Law in 1997 after teaching at the University of Chicago Law School for 12 years, where he was William B. Graham Professor of Law. Prior to his teaching career, Professor McConnell served as assistant to the solicitor general with the US Department of Justice, assistant general counsel for the US Office of Management and Budget, and clerked for Chief Judge J. Skelly Wright, of the District of Columbia US Circuit Court of Appeals. He also served a clerkship with US Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan. Among the country's most distinguished scholars in the fields of constitutional law and theory with a specialty in the religion clauses of the First Amendment, Professor McConnell has argued 11 times before the US Supreme Court. He is widely published in the areas of church-state relations and the First <b>...</b>